Extending Decidable Existential Rules by Joining Acyclicity and Guardedness
نویسندگان
چکیده
Existential rules, i.e. Datalog extended with existential quantifiers in rule heads, are currently studied under a variety of names such as Datalog+/–, ∀∃-rules, and tuple-generating dependencies. The renewed interest in this formalism is fuelled by a wealth of recently discovered language fragments for which query answering is decidable. This paper extends and consolidates two of the main approaches in this field – acyclicity and guardedness – by providing (1) complexity-preserving generalisations of weakly acyclic and weakly (frontier-)guarded rules, and (2) a novel formalism of glut-(frontier-)guarded rules that subsumes both. This builds on an insight that acyclicity can be used to extend any existential rule language while retaining decidability. Besides decidability, combined query complexities are established in all cases.
منابع مشابه
Revisiting Acyclicity and Guardedness Criteria for Decidability of Existential Rules
Existential rules, i.e. Datalog extended with existential quantifiers in rule heads, are currently studied under a variety of names such as Datalog+/–, ∀∃rules, and tuple-generating dependencies. The renewed interest in this formalism is fuelled by a wealth of recently discovered language fragments for which query answering is decidable. This paper extends and consolidates two of the main appro...
متن کاملRevisiting Acyclicity and Guardedness Criteria for Decidability of Existential Rules Technical Report
Existential rules, i.e. Datalog extended with existential quantifiers in rule heads, are currently studied under a variety of names such as Datalog+/–, ∀∃rules, and tuple-generating dependencies. The renewed interest in this formalism is fuelled by a wealth of recently discovered language fragments for which query answering is decidable. This paper extends and consolidates two of the main appro...
متن کاملCombining Existential Rules and Description Logics (Extended Version)
Query answering under existential rules — implications with existential quantifiers in the head — is known to be decidable when imposing restrictions on the rule bodies such as frontier-guardedness [BLM10, BLMS11]. Query answering is also decidable for description logics [Baa03], which further allow disjunction and functionality constraints (assert that certain relations are functions); however...
متن کاملCombining Existential Rules and Description Logics
Query answering under existential rules — implications with existential quantifiers in the head — is known to be decidable when imposing restrictions on the rule bodies such as frontier-guardedness [Baget et al., 2010; 2011a]. Query answering is also decidable for description logics [Baader, 2003], which further allow disjunction and functionality constraints (assert that certain relations are ...
متن کاملExtending Acyclicity Notions for Existential Rules (\emph{long version})
Existential rules have been proposed for representing on-tological knowledge, specifically in the context of Ontology-BasedQuery Answering. Entailment with existential rules is undecidable.We focus in this paper on conditions that ensure the terminationof a breadth-first forward chaining algorithm known as the chase.First, we propose a new tool that allows to extend existing...
متن کامل